Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-18 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-18 House Journal Page 3855 SB 226 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 226(FIN) am An Act relating to biennial registration of motor vehicles; imposing biennial registration fees on motor vehicles and setting the statutory amounts of a scheduled biennial municipal tax on motor vehicles; relating to motor vehicle emissions control programs; and providing for an effective date. with the: Journal Page FIN RPT HCS(FIN) NT 7DP 1NR 1AM 3744 ...TECH TITLE CHANGE 3744 FISCAL NOTE (DPS) 3745 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: 1996-04-18 House Journal Page 3856 SB 226 HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 226(FIN) An Act relating to biennial registration of motor vehicles; imposing biennial registration fees on motor vehicles and setting the statutory amounts of a scheduled biennial municipal tax on motor vehicles; relating to motor vehicle emissions control programs; amending the effective date in sec. 7, Chair. 56, SLA 1995; and providing for an effective date. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 13: Delete "$68" Insert "$70" Page 3, line 16: Delete "$78" Insert "$80" Page 3, line 17: Delete "$138" Insert "$140" Page 3, line 20: Delete "$168" Insert "$170" Page 4, line 6: Delete "$100" Insert "$102" Page 4, line 8: Delete "$170" Insert "$172" Page 4, line 10: Delete "$310" Insert "$312" 1996-04-18 House Journal Page 3857 SB 226 Page 4, line 11: Delete "$440" Insert "$442" Page 5, line 3: Delete "$68" Insert "$70" Page 5, line 17: Delete "$88" Insert "$90" Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Martin: Reduce each insert by $5. Representative Martin moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Martin moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the amendment Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 226(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 1996-04-18 House Journal Page 3858 SB 226 Yeas: Brown, Davies, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Ivan, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Phillips, Robinson, Williams Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Moses, Ogan, Parnell, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Willis Excused: B.Davis, Mackie And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 3, line 21: Delete $40" Insert $38" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that HCSCSSB 226(FIN) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 226(FIN) am H was read the third time. The question being: Shall HCS CSSB 226(FIN) am H pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 226(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 1996-04-18 House Journal Page 3859 SB 226 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: B.Davis, Mackie Absent: Kubina And so, HCS CSSB 226(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clauses. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Brown gave notice of reconsideration of her vote on HCS CSSB 226(FIN) am H.